cowl Posted yesterday at 10:21 Posted yesterday at 10:21 1 hour ago, JohnnyQuinnsQuiff said: Brilliant! Moaning about the potential moaners! Stop f***ing moaning! 2
wakefieldowl Posted yesterday at 10:24 Posted yesterday at 10:24 No doubt someone will moan because of their obsession with crappy politics
matthefish2002 Posted yesterday at 11:26 Posted yesterday at 11:26 I think problem will be opposite. People will be too sycophantic towards them like they were with Chansiri and shout down even the mildest of criticism towards them. Of course welcome anyone who takes over but hope many dont act almost like teengirls at a boy band concert many did 10 years ago.
1867tim Posted yesterday at 12:38 Posted yesterday at 12:38 13 hours ago, AwokenGiant said: Nobody will moan about the Waltons! I'll prove you wrong. The Waltons have $432 billion in the bank as a family and Walmart made $15 billion net profit in 2024. The family wealth and the business profitability has been - and continues to be - built on paying below average wages. There are no accurate figures for the percentage of their workforce who NEED FOOD STAMPS TO SURVIVE, but Walmart, like Sports Direct, is recognised as a high profit company and a low paying employer. They do give back, but, personally, I baulk at billionaire philanthropy paid for by the poorest. I would prefer owners with a greater sense of their social responsibility. For me, football's governing bodies have led us in the wrong direction and it should be all about fan ownership. I can moan about anyone, except my wife. 1 1
steelerian Posted yesterday at 12:38 Posted yesterday at 12:38 4 hours ago, JohnnyQuinnsQuiff said: Brilliant! Moaning about the potential moaners! You cant make it up, hey
F. Spiksley Posted yesterday at 12:42 Posted yesterday at 12:42 4 minutes ago, 1867tim said: I'll prove you wrong. The Waltons have $432 billion in the bank as a family and Walmart made $15 billion net profit in 2024. The family wealth and the business profitability has been - and continues to be - built on paying below average wages. There are no accurate figures for the percentage of their workforce who NEED FOOD STAMPS TO SURVIVE, but Walmart, like Sports Direct, is recognised as a high profit company and a low paying employer. They do give back, but, personally, I baulk at billionaire philanthropy paid for by the poorest. I would prefer owners with a greater sense of their social responsibility. For me, football's governing bodies have led us in the wrong direction and it should be all about fan ownership. I can moan about anyone, except my wife. Does your wife moan??
SDS Owl Posted yesterday at 13:44 Posted yesterday at 13:44 15 hours ago, A47Owl said: I doubt there will be anybody that our devoted following will object to. Cant be any worse than he who can't be named. Can they? Sorry mate but some will moan if it’s, for example, Mike Ashley.
A47Owl Posted yesterday at 15:14 Posted yesterday at 15:14 1 hour ago, SDS Owl said: Sorry mate but some will moan if it’s, for example, Mike Ashley. You can't please all the people all of the time. Almost... Almost.... Anybody will be better than him who can't be named. 1
SDS Owl Posted yesterday at 15:14 Posted yesterday at 15:14 Just now, A47Owl said: You can't please all the people all of the time. Almost... Almost.... Anybody will be better than him who can't be named. Agree.
prowl Posted yesterday at 15:28 Posted yesterday at 15:28 17 hours ago, podski1 said: How many people on here are gonna moan about them straight away saying that the admins have made the wrong decision!! I hope there's none 'cos I'm lovin' the positivity around the club at the mo, but you just can't please everyone!! If they don't announce a Director of Football in their opening statement to fans, I will be very upset with them. It marks them as 'wrong 'uns' straight away as far as I'm concerned. If they don't sign Amass and Shay Charles on the second day, that's it as far as I'm concerned. Boycott all games until they do. No, I don't think I'm being unreasonable at all. Far from it.
Harristheowl Posted yesterday at 15:29 Posted yesterday at 15:29 17 hours ago, UTO210491 said: No. they have no bias or say in whom. as long as they are not of banned states eg russia or unlikely to pass for other political reasons they simply accept the highest bid. If thats by 1p then so be it They really dont. Read the updates mate
Utah Owl Posted yesterday at 15:52 Posted yesterday at 15:52 At least we’ll know soon enough, then we can all start moaning about who we didn’t sign in the JTW when is the Lep being demolished etc.
1867tim Posted yesterday at 16:45 Posted yesterday at 16:45 4 hours ago, F. Spiksley said: Does your wife moan?? Not as much as yours.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now