Loppy Posted Saturday at 16:43 Posted Saturday at 16:43 Made no difference. Would have counted if Wright hadn't touched it. Only changed being 0-2 to 0-3. Getting hammered anyway. Bigger people to boo / protest 1 1
matthefish2002 Posted Saturday at 16:44 Posted Saturday at 16:44 A bit of a foot note on the day but yes a really poor decision by the officials. 1
zorbatheowl Posted Saturday at 16:50 Posted Saturday at 16:50 Pathetic from the officials. You can say made no difference 0-2/0-3 but who knows. The referee had a shocker at the lane Tuesday and he could see it was offside without the benefit of the linesperson. As for the Linesperson stood directly in line, was he blind or just bent? Should both be stood down from games. 4
Miffed Posted Saturday at 16:51 Posted Saturday at 16:51 Trying my best to find something to justify it…. Could there be a possibility that the linesman doesn’t think he played the ball forward and it was a sideways pass?
Kopparberg Posted Saturday at 16:56 Author Posted Saturday at 16:56 11 minutes ago, Loppy said: Made no difference. Would have counted if Wright hadn't touched it. Only changed being 0-2 to 0-3. Getting hammered anyway. Bigger people to boo / protest This is just a thread to laugh at the linesman really
Loppy Posted Saturday at 16:59 Posted Saturday at 16:59 Fair enough, it was a poor decision but I get why it was given 7
northeastowl Posted Saturday at 17:00 Posted Saturday at 17:00 8 minutes ago, Miffed said: Trying my best to find something to justify it…. Could there be a possibility that the linesman doesn’t think he played the ball forward and it was a sideways pass? Doesn't matter, even if it went sideways (or even backwards) it's still offside. 1
4evaowl Posted Saturday at 17:28 Posted Saturday at 17:28 Had we gone in a 2-0 I fancied us for a 3-2 win 4 1
Tommy Crawshaw Posted Saturday at 17:28 Posted Saturday at 17:28 28 minutes ago, Loppy said: Fair enough, it was a poor decision but I get why it was given Why was it given? He's clearly offside. 1 3
Big Jack Posted Saturday at 17:31 Posted Saturday at 17:31 29 minutes ago, Loppy said: Fair enough, it was a poor decision but I get why it was given I am glad you get why it was given because I can't see one reason why it would be given! 1 6
Miffed Posted Saturday at 17:51 Posted Saturday at 17:51 50 minutes ago, northeastowl said: Doesn't matter, even if it went sideways (or even backwards) it's still offside. Fair. I was just clutching at straws trying to find a reason behind the awful decision
Loppy Posted Saturday at 17:55 Posted Saturday at 17:55 23 minutes ago, Big Jack said: I am glad you get why it was given because I can't see one reason why it would be given! Linesman gave up on it. Was basically in the net and would have been a legal goal if Wright hadn't tapped it. I was just meh about it.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now