Waddle_8

Bit different - the supporters trust aren’t a prescribed terrorist organisation.

If we are truly trying to starve him out, surely a strike would be the best thing that could happen? No game would mean no ticket revenue and I would assume a refund to anyone who had a ticket for the game?

If I were a player in that Wednesday dressing room tonight, after all that has gone on in the past 6 months, I’d be checking my mobile banking app at 7:44pm tonight and if my wages weren’t in, I wouldn’t take to the pitch. Simple as that.

Does this suggest he’s covered the loan repayment and whatever is left over is being distributed? If that wasn’t the case, I would expect no payments whatsoever.

Ignore everything and everybody else. The boycotts are working.

No.

If he did have it, why would he not tell the EFL he has it? You’re right in the sense that it doesn’t definitively prove it, but I think we can certainly draw some inferences from it. The most likely reason he isn’t demonstrating to the EFL he has the funding is that he hasn’t got said funds.

Fair play. Thanks for the info. mate I remember you saying about a storm.

Or something has substantively changed ie the boycotts are biting or a loan company has called in a larger proportion of their debt perhaps?

It would appear so. All hail Bizzle.

Can you expand on the payment plan?

Mate, he’s a dead man walking. I will be astounded if there isn’t an agreement by the 30th September.

If Chansiri was trying to convince anyone he could carry on and/or has secured new funding, this puts that negotiating position to bed. Similarly, this won’t help in his attempts to persuade the loan company to roll the loan over. The walls are closing in, fast.

Very impressive

I’m confused too mate - why would this equate to an embargo on the club though?