Londoner1867

That’s still refusing to take a penalty. If Megan Fox invites me out on a date and I say I’m not confident or comfortable and don’t go meet her, I’ve refused to go meet her.

3-4 weeks ago ago some of our fans wouldn’t have blamed Röhl for going to Accrington Stanley, now here we are with a team who just missed on the playoffs interested in him and with an owner who will back him and people in here are laughing about it? Hmm. I’m not going to be so dismissive

I’m happy to accept an apology for your vile ad hominem attacks on me when you are ready to do so. You’ve let yourself down massively.

Yep I agree with you. Chansiri didn’t do anybody any favours, it made them both look bad and just raised more questions, he shouldn’t have gone public the way he did.

I hear you mate, I think what I was trying to get at was saying you’ve heard it from somebody close to the discussions what went on might not be evidence, but it would hold more bearing in a court as a testimony than “hmmm but can we trust Chansiri” Or maybe it wouldn’t, I’m not a legal expert Round in circles now anyway, I hope everybody who is capable of engaging in reasonable discussion enjoys the rest of their BH Those who aren’t, ask yourself who really is the troll here.

Yeah I accept what you’re saying mate. And contrary to what the other two bashing me on the head think I actually wanted a sensible chat here.

“FOOOOOOOOK there he goes again” incoming 3..2..1 Nothing original or clever about these deflection tactics

All you’ve done is proven you can’t debate sensibly, I’m not put off or scared by your administrator badge to tell you this and it’s so obvious to any neutral person what you’ve done here.

I can’t persuade you an anecdote is true so I accept you won’t accept it as proof, that’s fine. But I repeat it’s just what is classed as public record that I am defending the position of, therefore the emphasis is not on me to double down on what is already in public as true. I was met with that I am peddling things that are proven to be incorrect, to which I have said okay what is this proof, and I have had nothing at all in the way of a reasonable response from Neil and just ad hominem

I want a reasonable discussion with somebody who has this proof, anyone, please?

I have said that I know somebody who worked at the club. You can take it or leave it. And I repeat again it only supports what is public knowledge. I’m not disputing what is out in public. I’ve asked @ Owlstalk for “what has been proven to be incorrect” and I don’t even have an anecdote.

You are ignoring that I have asked you several times now to expand on what you mean has proven to be untrue. Say Foooooook I’m out or troll as much as you want, any reasonable person can see you’ve refused to provide this.

Did or did not @ Owlstalk say what I’ve said has been proven to be untrue and didn’t I ask to see this?

and I agree with most of that, I’d much prefer a debate about well did DM deserve to be paid a salary which is that of a top Championship manager, but instead the site owner prefers ad hominem attacks, because he can’t debate the actual topic

Am I really getting called a troll by somebody who just put the Ps onwards part in after my second reply to him? I think that you’ve resorted to dishonesty says a lot, you can’t prove me wrong or debate reasonably