Tewkesbury - Owlstalk | Sheffield Wednesday News for SWFC fans Jump to content

Tewkesbury

Member
  • Posts

    3,797
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Location
    Yorkshire

Recent Profile Visitors

4,894 profile views

Tewkesbury's Achievements

Mentor

Mentor (12/14)

  • One Year In
  • Posting Machine
  • Very Popular
  • Collaborator
  • Conversation Starter

Recent Badges

4.6k

Reputation

  1. My entire point in this thread is what has changed recently to put the club in immediate danger. This is something he's always done. Yes, the bloke's a ******** liability when he speaks and shouldn't be allowed within a foot of a pen or microphone. The thing is, he's always ranted. He's always had cash flow issues. They will already be well aware.
  2. Ranty man rants. It'd be more surprising if he didn't. Nothing has changed. This is what I'm saying. It's in his nature, like when the scorpion stings the frog. The sun rises in the east, Chansiri rants and the admin deflects from answering questions when he knows he's wrong.
  3. People were already asking questions about it as the embargo was on the EFL site. True story. I see you're only mentioning me in the third party now. If you're going to talk about me, at least @ me so I sew it. Coward. So, stop hiding and answer the questions instead of sniping from the middle of the thread.
  4. Nobody knows. It's Chansiri. Probably. All I know is that the money was paid quickly and payroll was on time.
  5. The embargo was already in place as he was late with the tax payment. He then called the star to tell them he had cash flow issues, if the bill wasn't paid immediately, think it was 24hrs or whatever we were in trouble. He them said he was waiting on a late payment from somewhere else, and that if the money wasn't paid, the fans would have to pay it. Then nothing after. Then a couple of days later, it turns up on the tax website as paid and the staff are paid in full.
  6. The threat was before that. The refusal to put in additional funding. The tax bill thing was a rant, he already had the money moving. As I said, it's just him kicking off, nothing new. I'm trying to find out what fundamentally changed recently, how did it go from 5mph to 199mph in a short time? The feelgood factor would have lasted till Southampton. Then it would have been much the same. They weren't the most resilient under DM, so can't see it being muvmch better. We can debate DM all day, you and I have opposite views on his style of play, so I'll leave that for a bit as we can go back and forth all week on that, as we have before.
  7. Still deflecting. So, so, sad to see you like this. As I said, answer my questions and I'll look for whatever evidence there is. I could go through this site and find many unsupported comments from yourself, but I can't be arsed. Anyway, if you weren't so eager to jump in and deflect from my questions, you'd have noticed that I replied to the original question before you asked for evidence. In that reply, I stated that I wasn't sure, it was something I'd heard. So whatever the outcome, I'm not lying as I stated where I got it from. Anyway, I asked first. Did he pay the players and tax bill? Is he still putting in extra funding? Are the season tickets a POS system provider issue? Simple yes/no answers please.
  8. The money in the budget still needs to come from somewhere. If there's 10p in the budget, it needs to be funded. Same as 10m. It is still an expense that either has to be funded or something else needs to be cut to fund it.
  9. The veiled threat was in response to actual abuse of his family. This is the one I don't get. "He's making threats." like the fans are the victims here. STOP ABUSING THE BLOKE'S FAMILY THEN, DICKHEADS. That is one I will defend him on. Letting DM walk was the right decision. Xisco didn't work, he's changed manager again. But letting DM walk was the correct decision.
  10. Where does the money in the slush fund come from? Have I once said he's very good at managing the club? As I said, there's enough out there to beat him with, without embellishments.
  11. He is. At 0%. And as it stands, it's not an issue.
  12. Why would sacking a manager and getting an entire new team not cost more money. We paid a fee for Pedersen. Can't see that being in the initial planning.
  13. So he sacked a manager who has already been sacked again. Well done him. He appointed a manager who won promotion from this league when DM was getting relegated with us. So it went wrong. Bad appointments happen. Look at Huddersfield. Still not reason for this level of hysteria.
  14. Xisco was still in place when he said it. If he wasn't putting money in, Xisco would still be here.
  15. Getting an entire new coaching staff is though.
×
×
  • Create New...