Shez

Supporters of other clubs

Pretty sure been a heavily featured club on sky is actually detrimental in a lot of cases, the money a pittance compared with the drop off in attendance in a lot of cases. Only really beneficial if the ground is sold out most weeks or the attendance is stable but even then, not a lot

But lots of owners throughout the leagues will have struggles finding the club, the sport is a financial black hole…though this is a higher profile case they can’t police every club. Cases now where clubs have had points deducted, sanctions etc for financial ‘wrong-doing’ is crazy, the amount of clubs that are running at a loss or struggling is a product of the changing game and the EFL or PL governing that change has only been detrimental to the game to be fair

Why would the EFL have any jurisdiction over the ownership of a club/business? Why, if they could, would they have any interest above other clubs having/had similar issues. The EFL can’t decide who owns what, only if they are fit to tenor a club in their competition, financial difficulties/mismanagement and lack of, as with all clubs, is down to the club. The club is potless, and this could be seen as karma given they tried to cheat their way out of the division until DC’s pockets were empty. Only thing EFL can do is sanction the club if it doesn’t now play by the rules, points, exclusion, demotion etc.

Wednesday won’t go bust, too big a club currently buyable at a price well below the potential value, regardless of the mess at the moment and the nutcase in charge Other clubs relish rivals hitting hard times but not to actually go under, Blunts for instance, they thrive on the two club city, as do Wednesday. Leeds had this same scenario, crazy owners that had been allowed to own a club they shouldn’t have been anywhere near because of the low buying price, lower leagues and similarly led to boycotting fans, poor attendance, awful football etc. Assuming the current short term issues get resolved, the longer term issue is the kind of buyer you get when the club is valued at £30/40/50m, chancers (we know). Glad we’re out of that hole. Like i said, regarding other clubs fans, take your medicine, we had to, that’s football…you give it when you can so take it when you must, things change quickly

This thread is literally about those two clubs and their interest

This fan base is notorious for been Billy big bo11ocks when things look to be going well…no surprise that arrogance has been met with ridicule an a joyous reaction now they aren’t. Sometimes you’ve to take your medicine. They did when the going got tough and everyone was gleefull at their league one minus 15. Looking at Leeds and having a laugh, guess what goes around comes around

Looks like that thread took off following a Wednesday fan on their forum giving it the big un when Wednesday we’re throwing money they didn’t have at players that weren’t add good as some thought. Funny how that Leeds team that were miles away mostly went on to finish 9th in the Premier League whilst every one knows what happened to the Galacticos put together by Chansiri and Co Can see why the poster ‘Hoddock’ went on to become a legend over there. Anyone want to own up to being Hoddock…

I see this got a laugh…just a reminder that mental illness is not a laughing matter

Enough what is enough...the EFL aren't in charge of the clubs finances, just uphold the rules for all clubs to adhere to, which this one hasn't, repeatedly. F**king embarrassment lashing out oat them.....

So what point is s third embargo, what does it cover or restrict that the other two didn’t already. Also, if payment to all 3 creditors are made what is lifted? Does the transfer window embargo get lifted when payments are made and the club can then sign players…why specify 3 windows if it’s lifted on payment? The article isn’t clear

Dear Owlsman **** Off Thanks God

Horse….bolted….

With their organisation, people are talking about real world authority, ie business ownership in which they have no jurisdiction