BC1867 - Owlstalk | Sheffield Wednesday News for SWFC fans Jump to content

BC1867

Member
  • Posts

    2,408
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Recent Profile Visitors

4,640 profile views

BC1867's Achievements

Mentor

Mentor (12/14)

  • Dedicated
  • Very Popular
  • Reacting Well
  • Posting Machine
  • Collaborator

Recent Badges

1.8k

Reputation

1

Community Answers

  1. Good way to waste a few mil if you get your wish. Class goal from smith . Got decked in his own half and sprinted to get in position to hit that.
  2. I agree with your assessment of the quality of our squad but it’s unquestionably Röhl’s squad. Can’t see how you say otherwise.
  3. Of our 148 coaches it might be an idea to put a couple of them on set pieces
  4. Wednesday octopus plush toys on sale in Megastore!!!!
  5. Yeah bit of an overreaction OP. Need to stick with Röhl and his staff. We’d be in admin to sack them all anyway
  6. Multiple reactions needed. Laugh. Agree. Like. Thanks. All in one. Also needs to prompt ‘close thread’ option.
  7. A blanket policy is admin’s prerogative but it tends to have a chilling effect on any forum and is clearly not being applied in a blanket fashion (i.e., some jokes remain). I don’t think obvious sarcasm could ever amount to libel (the effect of the words was to ridicule the post and therefore support the player - i.e., it would not have any chance of causing him serious harm (the test under the Act) or diminish his standing (the common law test for libel). Anyway doesn’t matter, keen not to scapegoat players. Hopefully all perform better going forward.
  8. I think that’s a stretch. Statements the reasonable reader would only read as a joke / sarcasm do not meet the standard required for defamation / libel. Elton John unsuccessfully sued a paper and lost on that basis. Anyway I don’t own the website so understand it’s at owner’s discretion, albeit I think it’s an overreaction.
  9. Some obviously made up poo about windass doing drugs with hookers (bit like the crystal meth comment) to make fun of ridiculous rumour in the thread about him being hungover. Obviously sarcasm so curious why it’s deleted. I did say boobs though so could have been struck for that reason.
  10. Have some posts been deleted from this thread? I think mine has. Admin’s sarcasm detector seems to be running on fumes!
  11. Can’t overreact. Got to let Röhl do his work. Preston were top after 7 games on 19 points last season then their arse fell out. 1 game, 2 games, 7 games don’t make a season. Today is a low point which we must never return to. That is the challenge.
  12. Roles reversed from against Plymouth. We look well off it and no plan. Also signposted to whole league how to deal with us. Much work to be done for Röhl and his team.
  13. officials have been correct imho. Free kick debatable but that’s it.
  14. Superb today!
  15. What about the retro shirts the club shop sold for several years? I have 1 or 2 I bought from the club shop years ago (can’t prove the purchase as years ago). How will they be identified and distinguished from a ‘fake’ this rule is meant to relate to? Or will they be banned too?
×
×
  • Create New...