Tollertonowl

Everyone knows and appreciates the issue so lets not get stupid... Already we have fans turning on their own fans who have season tickets and are turning up... Surely positive protests are what is going to gain support and not negative cr@p...

It's been weird for sometime!!!!

He could have left for a good last pay day, but instead decided to put his families happiness and SWFC first... He was already an SWFC legend IMO, but that just cemented it for me....

Wasn't the fans boycott of this game to purposely make it like a game in the park? And all I was just suggesting is that we actually turn up and protest at games/ support the team rather than just not go at all...

I think the point was made in the Leeds match, as Kop and North stand were empty... Also SWFC are a big club and maybe some supporters just wanted to be there to back the team - so shouldn't be knocked for attending.... I am also not sure that I fully agree with boycotting matches to financially impact DC as IMO we should just be supporting the team (especially SWFC Jnrs) and also the fact that DC is clearly not a businessman so probably doesn't care... FFS DC wants more than double the club value to sell regardless of the issue being raised in parliament... I personally think that getting other teams to play against us in Black/Gold or their fans to support our cause in other ways (Joint Protests) is the best way to go for SWFC along with the our small team beating the odds...

I watched them against Southampton and if Kiefer Moore had just squared the ball across to Windass for a tap in before the break then they would have been 2 goals up and then a completely different game... I might be wrong from the last 2 games I watched him play, but IMO Kiefer Moore cost the Blunts promotion and Wrexham a result in their first game so I don't rate him as a £2MM player... They (Wrexham) also looked pretty descent to watch as played good attacking/pressing football and with Windass playing reminded me a little bit of us after turning the corner under DR... I also appreciate their fans support, but hopefully the kids so that we can keep within touching distance of a great escape come the new year and owner(s).

Whereas they just normally disappear...

The thing I like most out of all this is the kids being given a chance - no pressure....

I know things are bad at the moment, but it is also good to see the U23's step up accordingly...

Watching him on the touchline I suspect that he is giving himself a harder time than you are from the side-lines... Plus he could have just left and got himself a good final pay day elsewhere, but has instead chosen to stay so I struggle to hear a word against him at the moment... The first Leicester goal was clearly offside as their player was at least 5yds off before running back into play, which was somehow missed by the linesman?!? So I get his frustration for the descent and then the 2nd yellow was correct, but after missing the offside/ soft yellow - I couldn't believe he was sent off... IMO the result today was determined by the EFL officials who should have disallowed the first Leicester goal, as clearly offside and Baz wouldn't have been booked for descent if they just did their jobs... In terms of Baz he can do what he wants for me as clearly cares about the club, fans, community and city. If Baz didn't care he could have left for a last final pay day with others accordingly

In slow motion footage the 2nd yellow was arguably correct - even if it looked like a 50/50 in real time footage... However, it wasn't as clear cut as the Leicester first goal, which didn't need any slow motion to determine it as offside given their player was about 5 yards offside before running back into play... I therefore get why Baz was booked for descent as the officials were horrific and as is all to often in the EFL it was the officials actions (not the players) that determined the end result. Then the fact that Baz was clearly eating himself alive on the touch line after made things worse, as we all know that he is Mr SWFC and sacrificed a last final contract to stay and fight for the club....

What's your issue with the post as makes sense to me?

As it was borderline if he touched the ball or not I could maybe argue that he was involved in play... And in terms of being offside when the ball was kicked that isn't even debatable...

Ref must have been man of the match for them as surely the first goal was offside and the Bannan sending off the cherry on the cake...