TheSlicer - Owlstalk | Sheffield Wednesday News for SWFC fans Jump to content

TheSlicer

Member
  • Posts

    2,836
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

TheSlicer last won the day on May 31 2023

TheSlicer had the most liked content!

Profile Information

  • Location
    Your mums love canal

Recent Profile Visitors

27,665 profile views

TheSlicer's Achievements

Mentor

Mentor (12/14)

  • Reacting Well
  • Dedicated
  • Very Popular
  • Posting Machine
  • Collaborator

Recent Badges

4.3k

Reputation

  1. Exactly this. And this is why I’m pink lint
  2. I’m all for this and I back anything the trust calls for, so please don’t take this question the wrong way. What is this to achieve? Is it just to get more attention on the club, cause it’s not costing that ******** any money is it?
  3. Can we get a load of people outside the ground flying drones over. Even 3 or 4 all flying over the pitch would cause carnage. I don’t have one so can’t participate but I think this is a nice easy way to get games called off, and we as a fanbase should be looking to make it happen.
  4. Did you politely ask him if he understood the not a pound in the ground idea. Maybe he wasn’t aware?
  5. I hope you’re both right. as said 5k is too many
  6. I don’t disagree with you mate I think it would be a fabulous statement to make. Unfortunately I don’t think it’s likely to happen. my point was more towards the little bit of money that’s spent in the ground. The money that he will be taking in now from in ground sales and the odd potg is minimal and won’t have much effect on his contractual outgoings.
  7. The renewals is the big thing. Hopefully it’s a sizeable amount that don’t renew. There will still be 10k plus imo
  8. People are starving him of money. The odd few buying a pint or a pie or even a March day ticker won’t make a blind bit of difference.
  9. On the players. I hope they just refuse, but I think they’re being advised off the FA to not do it. I can’t think of any other reason why they would risk injuries whilst not getting paid
  10. The minority that went on the pitch has had a bigger impact than the numbers would suggest imo. they’ve more than likely got the club (chancer) a hefty fine. they’ve brought more attention to the situation, many other clubs fans are applauding them on backing them on social media.
  11. This I 100% agree with mate, and you’d hope it’s the case.
  12. Also, I’m sure that disruption will get the clubs fine if some sort anyway
  13. If banning orders are given out by the club, would these be revoked under new ownership
×
×
  • Create New...