It’s a criticism that comes up quite commonly about teams doing poorly have zero incentive to turn their season around.
I’m pretty sure there is some form of prize minor for champions, premiers and cup winners. I don’t know the details of money distribution, but there is an emphasis on trying to make sure we don’t have a competition which only ever has one or two teams win it every season. If we ended up with a Scotland or France situation no one would bother with it.
The paying three entities has been around since I was a kid and agree it’s idiotic. The costs and complexities around junior football in this country is ridiculous. Unfortunately it’s a case for it to change the first step is for State associations to vote to get rid of themselves and that’s never happening.
Sport operates differently here to the UK. It isn’t a pseudo American thing, it’s an Australian thing. NRL and AFL have had finals and various different systems (Salary caps, catchment areas for players) in place for over 100 years. People are used to it here.
Football in this country could do things differently, but the money available and the travel costs are hugely prohibitive. The A-League exists because 20 years ago the decision was made to put the NSL out of its misery. The NSL originally tried to be structured in a more traditional European sense, but had to try and change to survive and it struggled. The best way forward was decided to Australianise the competition, which had initial success. Should it always be this way? Hopefully not, but I don’t see it being in a position to change anytime in the near future.