The Batman

Dunno why we want a billionaire owner. Just need to change the formation and we can compete with teams thay have spent millions

If we cant defend the Directors Box We can forget promotion

All the build up we knew we were probably gonna be beat Now we're inevitably getting beat we're replacing the Manager Ffs

That was nailed on when they were banging on about the Pigs 2nd half starts

These commentators blind. They've got hold of eachothers shirts Tankanga is a dirty ******** Had hold of Palmers throat earlier

Can I request that the pictures be out of focus? The blurrier the better, so the guessing game is more fun

Scan the qr from your phone

Q) can you tell us who has provided PoF and who has put un a bid? A) No. We cannot divulge such information Q) Are Walton Penner involved? A) No. Theyre not. See the difference? Saying someone is not involved breaks no rules and doesn't mean you have to know everyone who is involved.

Being told who is and being told who isn't, is 2 different things

Wait until we can sign some players again. Then TheBizzle will retake his rightful place as Owlstalk ITK King

Well yeah, why would anyone deny their involvement unless theyre definitely involved?! I used to work for Walmart, in a supermarket, nothing exciting but, I might have my old discount card lying around somewhere. Gonna dig it out get 10% off my next Season Ticket. Get in

So how many times have the local journos dismissed an ITK rumour about the Waltons? Reading this thread you get the impression its fairly regularly Which is then seen as suspicious. Like all conspiracies, everything points to what you beleive. Confirmation bias as its best. Not seen it that much tbh, but not looked. Just seen the articles after the KW interview and now this, and Rob is a Wednesdayite so will have seen a lot of the waffle we all spout on here and elsewhere

We're so far down the Walton Penner rabbit hole here, that even trusted sources saying its not them, just further proves it is for some Go back and read the stories written about W/P when they spoke about it with Kris Wigfield. Maybe you can clutch at straws and interpret his answer as diplomacy, which for me doent hold up anyway. But they were clear in their articles that the rumour was being dismissed. Even though the wording of the answer may have muddied the water for some, I reckon they chat off the record too and they were confident in putting the rumour to bed. Well they thought they were, but it won't go away

because, although the local media won't have all the information on who is or isn't bidding, they have been told (when they asked) by the Administrators that the Waltons aren't.

Rob Staton

ITK

Still. It's nice to have an official 2 week deadline this time!

5th December... 2 weeks!

My memory of that period is a but rusty. Didn't Shreeves do well as Caretaker? After replacing Jewell. I really disliked Jewell, though he was hopeless and vaguely remember thinking Dave Allen was brilliant for coming in and getting rid of him. Think that was when DA's 1st steps in his time with us?? It's all a blur

Just reading through the minutes. This is interesting... "CL pointed out that there have been rumours online about a Qatari investment fund and two individuals from Saudi Arabi being interested in buying SWFC. He asked, due to the poor human rights record in both countries, whether consideration of these ethical concerns when assessing bids would come from the administrators, the EFL or both. KW replied that the EFL’s Owners and Directors test would focus more on ethical concerns, but he is actively looking at other examples where buyers from such countries have passed the tests to buy UK clubs. He also advised fans to take any speculation with a pinch of salt, as the most serious prospective buyers won’t be leaking anything to the press and thus are unlikely to be named on social media." He's "actively looking". Got to mean he's got a reason to actively look surely??

The other day I read it'd be Thursday when we got a decision on this Could be a shitstorm Friday Get in

ffs

pages and pages of people explaining admin laws in slightly different ways, post after post this is up there with the worst threads in Owlstalk history I don't know why I keep looking

If the person putting the cash in wanted their name out there it would be

Well it was correct, in terms of how the loan went