wellbeaten-the-owl - Owlstalk | Sheffield Wednesday News for SWFC fans Jump to content

wellbeaten-the-owl

Member
  • Posts

    6,082
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

wellbeaten-the-owl last won the day on September 25

wellbeaten-the-owl had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

7,634 profile views

wellbeaten-the-owl's Achievements

Veteran

Veteran (13/14)

  • Reacting Well
  • Very Popular
  • Dedicated
  • Posting Machine
  • Collaborator

Recent Badges

7.9k

Reputation

1

Community Answers

  1. Need to be realistic, won't be a full boycott. But if there's less than 8k in ground including away support then that's a success
  2. Will show what a farce the official "attendances" are when there is 6k in stadium but given as 22k
  3. Don't disagree but loved football and knew how to run a club and make a profit out of an industry that swallowed up others. Compared with current incumbent he was a hell of a good bloke and a terrific owner. RIP
  4. Those that went on did what they think was needed, personally think was unwise as risked personal consequence with no reward, but that's their choice and they can do what they want no issues with that . Do have issues with ones that there goading them to do it, saying that there was no risk because couldn't ban us all etc. If you want to make a difference stay away, don't enter ground, don't give him a penny home or away and starve him out.
  5. But going on pitch wasn't ever going to make that any more or less likely Club won't go Chansiri will.
  6. I also hope for world peace and to win lottery. You really think when it's cost club in Extra policing he won't go after those fans?
  7. Not worth the banning orders. Bad idea from start, online keyboard warriors pushing others to risk bans whilst they stay away boycotting. No person at the club will want to push for banning orders but the one that matters will
  8. Until he sues the fans that go on (don't believe for a minute he wouldn't)
  9. @Toadie has written a good piece in the star about the ramifications for the individuals/club. Not sure anyone would think he wouldn't take legal action if he had chance, yeah go on pitch for a pointless exercise, lose your jobs, home, and never be able to set foot in Hillsborough again afterwards, that'll show him!
  10. Wouldn't be shocked if there was policing in the ground tomorrow. Even if nobody gets in pitch at least It'll cost him more money with a big policing bill
  11. And what good did it do or help in anyway to get the owner out?
  12. Probably right, more likely 20 or 30 try, get in trouble and the vindictive sod throws book at them with bans etc
  13. Fully agree not a supporter in the ground against them would be a great idea. Only positive thing protests can achieve is media coverage against chansiri, there been loads of that this week everything all negative so n one direction.
  14. Trust have taken the de facto lead in organising the protests. You've constantly said about education about consequences of actions which i fully agree with. If there's potential that it could definitely rail some of the goodwill they've gotten from the football community no harm then also saying that, don't have to outright say don't do it but actions do have consequences. It's not even the featured game on sky either, if you really wanted to use this option to get massive exposure we have a game live in ITV next month
×
×
  • Create New...